Identifying inhibitors of NSP16-NSP10 of SARS-CoV-2 from large databases.

The COVID-19 pandemic, which has already claimed millions of lives, continues to pose a serious threat to human health, requiring the development of new effective drugs. Non-structural proteins of SARS-CoV-2 play an important role in viral replication and infection. Among them, NSP16 (non-structured protein 16) and its cofactor NSP10 (non-structured protein 10) perform C2'-O methylation at the 5' end of the viral RNA, which promotes efficient virus replication. Therefore, the NSP16-NSP10 complex becomes an attractive target for drug development. Using a multi-step virtual screening protocol which includes Lipinski's rule, docking, steered molecular dynamics and umbrella sampling, we searched for potential inhibitors from the PubChem and anti-HIV databases. It has been shown that CID 135566620 compound from PubChem is the best candidate with an inhibition constant in the sub-µM range. The Van der Waals interaction was found to be more important than the electrostatic interaction in the binding affinity of this compound to NSP16-NSP10. Further in vitro and in vivo studies are needed to test the activity of the identified compound against COVID-19.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Antibody-nanobody combination increases their neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 and nanobody H11-H4 is effective against Alpha, Kappa and Delta variants.

The global spread of COVID-19 is devastating health systems and economies worldwide. While the use of vaccines has yielded encouraging results, the emergence of new variants of SARS-CoV-2 shows that combating COVID-19 remains a big challenge. One of the most promising treatments is the use of not only antibodies, but also nanobodies. Recent experimental studies revealed that the combination of antibody and nanobody can significantly improve their neutralizing ability through binding to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, but the molecular mechanisms underlying this observation remain largely unknown. In this work, we investigated the binding affinity of the CR3022 antibody and H11-H4 nanobody to the SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) using molecular modeling. Both all-atom steered molecular dynamics simulations and coarse-grained umbrella sampling showed that, consistent with the experiment, CR3022 associates with RBD more strongly than H11-H4. We predict that the combination of CR3022 and H11-H4 considerably increases their binding affinity to the spike protein. The electrostatic interaction was found to control the association strength of CR3022, but the van der Waals interaction dominates in the case of H11-H4. However, our study for a larger set of nanobodies and antibodies showed that the relative role of these interactions depends on the specific complex. Importantly, we showed Beta, Gamma, Lambda, and Mu variants reduce the H11-H4 activity while Alpha, Kappa and Delta variants increase its neutralizing ability, which is in line with experiment reporting that the nanobody elicited from the llama is very promising for fighting against the Delta variant.

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Binds to Human Cells More Strongly than the Wild Type: Evidence from Molecular Dynamics Simulation.

The emergence of the variant of concern Omicron (B.1.1.529) of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has aggravated the Covid-19 pandemic due to its very contagious ability. The high infection rate may be due to the high binding affinity of Omicron to human cells, but both experimental and computational studies have yielded conflicting results on this issue. Some studies have shown that the Omicron variant binds to human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2) more strongly than the wild type (WT), but other studies have reported comparable binding affinities. To shed light on this open problem, in this work, we calculated the binding free energy of the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the WT and Omicron spike protein to hACE2 using all-atom molecular dynamics simulation and the molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area method. We showed that Omicron binds to human cells more strongly than the WT due to increased RBD charge, which enhances electrostatic interaction with negatively charged hACE2. N440K, T478K, E484A, Q493R, and Q498R mutations in the RBD have been found to play a critical role in the stability of the RBD-hACE2 complex. The effect of homogeneous and heterogeneous models of glycans coating the viral RBD and the peptidyl domain of hACE2 was examined. Although the total binding free energy is not sensitive to the glycan model, the distribution of per-residue interaction energies depends on it. In addition, glycans have a little effect on the binding affinity of the WT RBD to hACE2.

Cocktail of REGN Antibodies Binds More Strongly to SARS-CoV-2 Than Its Components, but the Omicron Variant Reduces Its Neutralizing Ability.

A promising approach to combat Covid-19 infections is the development of effective antiviral antibodies that target the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Understanding the structures and molecular mechanisms underlying the binding of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 can contribute to quickly achieving this goal. Recently, a cocktail of REGN10987 and REGN10933 antibodies was shown to be an excellent candidate for the treatment of Covid-19. Here, using all-atom steered molecular dynamics and coarse-grained umbrella sampling, we examine the interactions of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein with REGN10987 and REGN10933 separately as well as together. Both computational methods show that REGN10933 binds to RBD more strongly than REGN10987. Importantly, the cocktail binds to RBD (simultaneous binding) more strongly than its components. The dissociation constants of REGN10987-RBD and REGN10933-RBD complexes calculated from the coarse-grained simulations are in good agreement with the experimental data. Thus, REGN10933 is probably a better candidate for treating Covid-19 than REGN10987, although the cocktail appears to neutralize the virus more efficiently than REGN10933 or REGN10987 alone. The association of REGN10987 with RBD is driven by van der Waals interactions, while electrostatic interactions dominate in the case of REGN10933 and the cocktail. We also studied the effectiveness of these antibodies on the two most dangerous variants Delta and Omicron. Consistent with recent experimental reports, our results confirmed that the Omicron variant reduces the neutralizing activity of REGN10933, REGN10987, and REGN10933+REGN10987 with the K417N, N440K, L484A, and Q498R mutations playing a decisive role, while the Delta variant slightly changes their activity.

Electrostatic Interactions Explain the Higher Binding Affinity of the CR3022 Antibody for SARS-CoV-2 than the 4A8 Antibody.

A structural understanding of the mechanism by which antibodies bind SARS-CoV-2 at the atomic level is highly desirable as it can tell the development of more effective antibodies to treat Covid-19. Here, we use steered molecular dynamics (SMD) and coarse-grained simulations to estimate the binding affinity of the monoclonal antibodies CR3022 and 4A8 to the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) and SARS-CoV-2 N-terminal domain (NTD). Consistent with experiments, our SMD and coarse-grained simulations both indicate that CR3022 has a higher affinity for SARS-CoV-2 RBD than 4A8 for the NTD, and the coarse-grained simulations indicate the former binds three times stronger to its respective epitope. This finding shows that CR3022 is a candidate for Covid-19 therapy and is likely a better choice than 4A8. Energetic decomposition of the interaction energies between these two complexes reveals that electrostatic interactions explain the difference in the observed binding affinity between the two complexes. This result could lead to a new approach for developing anti-Covid-19 antibodies in which good candidates must contain charged amino acids in the area of contact with the virus.

Remdesivir Strongly Binds to Both RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase and Main Protease of SARS-CoV-2: Evidence from Molecular Simulations.

The outbreak of a new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2) has caused a global COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic, resulting in millions of infections and thousands of deaths around the world. There is currently no drug or vaccine for COVID-19, but it has been revealed that some commercially available drugs are promising, at least for treating symptoms. Among them, remdesivir, which can block the activity of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) in old SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV viruses, has been prescribed to COVID-19 patients in many countries. A recent experiment showed that remdesivir binds to SARS-CoV-2 with an inhibition constant of µM, but the exact target has not been reported. In this work, combining molecular docking, steered molecular dynamics, and umbrella sampling, we examined its binding affinity to two targets including the main protease (Mpro), also known as 3C-like protease, and RdRp. We showed that remdesivir binds to Mpro slightly weaker than to RdRp, and the corresponding inhibition constants, consistent with the experiment, fall to the µM range. The binding mechanisms of remdesivir to two targets differ in that the electrostatic interaction is the main force in stabilizing the RdRp-remdesivir complex, while the van der Waals interaction dominates in the Mpro-remdesivir case. Our result indicates that remdesivir can target not only RdRp but also Mpro, which can be invoked to explain why this drug is effective in treating COVID-19. We have identified residues of the target protein that make the most important contribution to binding affinity, and this information is useful for drug development for this disease.

Does SARS-CoV-2 Bind to Human ACE2 More Strongly Than Does SARS-CoV?

The 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) epidemic, which was first reported in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020. Genetically, SARS-CoV-2 is closely related to SARS-CoV, which caused a global epidemic with 8096 confirmed cases in more than 25 countries from 2002 to 2003. Given the significant morbidity and mortality rate, the current pandemic poses a danger to all of humanity, prompting us to understand the activity of SARS-CoV-2 at the atomic level. Experimental studies have revealed that spike proteins of both SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV bind to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) before entering the cell for replication. However, the binding affinities reported by different groups seem to contradict each other. Wrapp et al. (Science 2020, 367, 1260-1263) showed that the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 binds to the ACE2 peptidase domain (ACE2-PD) more strongly than does SARS-CoV, and this fact may be associated with a greater severity of the new virus. However, Walls et al. (Cell 2020, 181, 281-292) reported that SARS-CoV-2 exhibits a higher binding affinity, but the difference between the two variants is relatively small. To understand the binding mechnism and experimental results, we investigated how the receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV (SARS-CoV-RBD) and SARS-CoV-2 (SARS-CoV-2-RBD) interacts with a human ACE2-PD using molecular modeling. We applied a coarse-grained model to calculate the dissociation constant and found that SARS-CoV-2 displays a 2-fold higher binding affinity. Using steered all-atom molecular dynamics simulations, we demonstrate that, like a coarse-grained simulation, SARS-CoV-2-RBD was associated with ACE2-PD more strongly than was SARS-CoV-RBD, as evidenced by a higher rupture force and larger pulling work. We show that the binding affinity of both viruses to ACE2 is driven by electrostatic interactions.